Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers

Harihar Rajaram; Anantha Aiyyer; Suzana Camargo; Christopher D. Cappa; Andrew J. Dombard; Kathleen A. Donohue; Sarah Feakins; Lucy Flesch; Robinson Fulweiler; Neil Ganju; Alessandra Giannini; Yu Gu; Christian Huber; Valeriy Ivanov; Kristopher Karnauskas; Monika Korte; Kevin Lewis; Gang Lu; Gudrun Magnusdottir; Mathieu Morlighem; Marit Oieroset; Yuichi Otsuka; Germán A. Prieto; Bo Qiu; Lynn Russell; Hui Su; Daoyuan Sun; Guiling Wang; Kaicun Wang; Caitlin Whalen; Angelicque E. White; Quentin Williams; Andrew Yau

doi:10.1029/2024GL109626

Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers

Harihar Rajaram
, Anantha Aiyyer
, Suzana Camargo
, Christopher D. Cappa
, Andrew J. Dombard
, Kathleen A. Donohue
, Sarah Feakins
, Lucy Flesch
, Robinson Fulweiler
, Neil Ganju
, Alessandra Giannini
, Yu Gu
, Christian Huber
, Valeriy Ivanov
, Kristopher Karnauskas
, Monika Korte
, Kevin Lewis
, Gang Lu
, Gudrun Magnusdottir
, Mathieu Morlighem

Marit Oieroset, Yuichi Otsuka, Germán A. Prieto, Bo Qiu, Lynn Russell, Hui Su, Daoyuan Sun, Guiling Wang, Kaicun Wang, Caitlin Whalen, Angelicque E. White, Quentin Williams, Andrew Yau

Johns Hopkins University
North Carolina State University
Columbia University
University of California at Davis
University of Illinois at Chicago
University of Rhode Island
University of Southern California
Purdue University
Boston University
United States Geological Survey
International Research Institute for Climate and Society
University of California
Brown University
University of Michigan
University of Colorado Boulder
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - German Research Centre for Geosciences
National Center for Atmospheric Research
University of California at Irvine
Dartmouth College
University of California at Berkeley
Nagoya University
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
University of California at San Diego
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
University of Science and Technology of China
University of Connecticut
Peking University
University of Washington
University of California at Santa Cruz
University of Calgary

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

Abstract

On behalf of the journal, AGU, and the scientific community, the editors of Geophysical Research Letters would like to sincerely thank those who reviewed manuscripts for us in 2023. The hours reading and commenting on manuscripts not only improve the manuscripts, but also increase the scientific rigor of future research in the field. With the advent of AGU's data policy, many reviewers have also helped immensely to evaluate the accessibility and availability of data, and many have provided insightful comments that helped to improve the data presentation and quality. We greatly appreciate the assistance of the reviewers in advancing open science, which is a key objective of AGU's data policy. We particularly appreciate the timely reviews in light of the demands imposed by the rapid review process at Geophysical Research Letters. We received 4,512 submissions in 2023 and 5,112 reviewers contributed to their evaluation by providing 8,587 reviews in total. We deeply appreciate their contributions.

Original language	English
Article number	e2024GL109626
Journal	Geophysical Research Letters
Volume	51
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109626
State	Published - May 16 2024
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

editorial
peer review

Access to Document

10.1029/2024GL109626

Cite this

Rajaram, H., Aiyyer, A., Camargo, S., Cappa, C. D., Dombard, A. J., Donohue, K. A., Feakins, S., Flesch, L., Fulweiler, R., Ganju, N., Giannini, A., Gu, Y., Huber, C., Ivanov, V., Karnauskas, K., Korte, M., Lewis, K., Lu, G., Magnusdottir, G., ... Yau, A. (2024). Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(9), Article e2024GL109626. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109626

@article{b25290d331ad4f0ea2b23718a756be19,

title = "Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers",

abstract = "On behalf of the journal, AGU, and the scientific community, the editors of Geophysical Research Letters would like to sincerely thank those who reviewed manuscripts for us in 2023. The hours reading and commenting on manuscripts not only improve the manuscripts, but also increase the scientific rigor of future research in the field. With the advent of AGU's data policy, many reviewers have also helped immensely to evaluate the accessibility and availability of data, and many have provided insightful comments that helped to improve the data presentation and quality. We greatly appreciate the assistance of the reviewers in advancing open science, which is a key objective of AGU's data policy. We particularly appreciate the timely reviews in light of the demands imposed by the rapid review process at Geophysical Research Letters. We received 4,512 submissions in 2023 and 5,112 reviewers contributed to their evaluation by providing 8,587 reviews in total. We deeply appreciate their contributions.",

keywords = "editorial, peer review",

author = "Harihar Rajaram and Anantha Aiyyer and Suzana Camargo and Cappa, \{Christopher D.\} and Dombard, \{Andrew J.\} and Donohue, \{Kathleen A.\} and Sarah Feakins and Lucy Flesch and Robinson Fulweiler and Neil Ganju and Alessandra Giannini and Yu Gu and Christian Huber and Valeriy Ivanov and Kristopher Karnauskas and Monika Korte and Kevin Lewis and Gang Lu and Gudrun Magnusdottir and Mathieu Morlighem and Marit Oieroset and Yuichi Otsuka and Prieto, \{Germ{\'a}n A.\} and Bo Qiu and Lynn Russell and Hui Su and Daoyuan Sun and Guiling Wang and Kaicun Wang and Caitlin Whalen and White, \{Angelicque E.\} and Quentin Williams and Andrew Yau",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024. The Authors. Geophysical Research Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.",

year = "2024",

month = may,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1029/2024GL109626",

language = "English",

volume = "51",

journal = "Geophysical Research Letters",

issn = "0094-8276",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "9",

}

Rajaram, H, Aiyyer, A, Camargo, S, Cappa, CD, Dombard, AJ, Donohue, KA, Feakins, S, Flesch, L, Fulweiler, R, Ganju, N, Giannini, A, Gu, Y, Huber, C, Ivanov, V, Karnauskas, K, Korte, M, Lewis, K, Lu, G, Magnusdottir, G, Morlighem, M, Oieroset, M, Otsuka, Y, Prieto, GA, Qiu, B, Russell, L, Su, H, Sun, D, Wang, G, Wang, K, Whalen, C, White, AE, Williams, Q & Yau, A 2024, 'Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers', Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 51, no. 9, e2024GL109626. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109626

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers

AU - Rajaram, Harihar

AU - Aiyyer, Anantha

AU - Camargo, Suzana

AU - Cappa, Christopher D.

AU - Dombard, Andrew J.

AU - Donohue, Kathleen A.

AU - Feakins, Sarah

AU - Flesch, Lucy

AU - Fulweiler, Robinson

AU - Ganju, Neil

AU - Giannini, Alessandra

AU - Gu, Yu

AU - Huber, Christian

AU - Ivanov, Valeriy

AU - Karnauskas, Kristopher

AU - Korte, Monika

AU - Lewis, Kevin

AU - Lu, Gang

AU - Magnusdottir, Gudrun

AU - Morlighem, Mathieu

AU - Oieroset, Marit

AU - Otsuka, Yuichi

AU - Prieto, Germán A.

AU - Qiu, Bo

AU - Russell, Lynn

AU - Su, Hui

AU - Sun, Daoyuan

AU - Wang, Guiling

AU - Wang, Kaicun

AU - Whalen, Caitlin

AU - White, Angelicque E.

AU - Williams, Quentin

AU - Yau, Andrew

PY - 2024/5/16

Y1 - 2024/5/16

N2 - On behalf of the journal, AGU, and the scientific community, the editors of Geophysical Research Letters would like to sincerely thank those who reviewed manuscripts for us in 2023. The hours reading and commenting on manuscripts not only improve the manuscripts, but also increase the scientific rigor of future research in the field. With the advent of AGU's data policy, many reviewers have also helped immensely to evaluate the accessibility and availability of data, and many have provided insightful comments that helped to improve the data presentation and quality. We greatly appreciate the assistance of the reviewers in advancing open science, which is a key objective of AGU's data policy. We particularly appreciate the timely reviews in light of the demands imposed by the rapid review process at Geophysical Research Letters. We received 4,512 submissions in 2023 and 5,112 reviewers contributed to their evaluation by providing 8,587 reviews in total. We deeply appreciate their contributions.

AB - On behalf of the journal, AGU, and the scientific community, the editors of Geophysical Research Letters would like to sincerely thank those who reviewed manuscripts for us in 2023. The hours reading and commenting on manuscripts not only improve the manuscripts, but also increase the scientific rigor of future research in the field. With the advent of AGU's data policy, many reviewers have also helped immensely to evaluate the accessibility and availability of data, and many have provided insightful comments that helped to improve the data presentation and quality. We greatly appreciate the assistance of the reviewers in advancing open science, which is a key objective of AGU's data policy. We particularly appreciate the timely reviews in light of the demands imposed by the rapid review process at Geophysical Research Letters. We received 4,512 submissions in 2023 and 5,112 reviewers contributed to their evaluation by providing 8,587 reviews in total. We deeply appreciate their contributions.

KW - editorial

KW - peer review

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85192071652

U2 - 10.1029/2024GL109626

DO - 10.1029/2024GL109626

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:85192071652

SN - 0094-8276

VL - 51

JO - Geophysical Research Letters

JF - Geophysical Research Letters

IS - 9

M1 - e2024GL109626

ER -

Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this