Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Tiered approach to resilience assessment

  • Igor Linkov
  • , Cate Fox-Lent
  • , Laura Read
  • , Craig R. Allen
  • , James C. Arnott
  • , Emanuele Bellini
  • , Jon Coaffee
  • , Marie Valentine Florin
  • , Kirk Hatfield
  • , Iain Hyde
  • , William Hynes
  • , Aleksandar Jovanovic
  • , Roger Kasperson
  • , John Katzenberger
  • , Patrick W. Keys
  • , James H. Lambert
  • , Richard Moss
  • , Peter S. Murdoch
  • , Jose Palma-Oliveira
  • , Roger S. Pulwarty
  • Dale Sands, Edward A. Thomas, Mari R. Tye, David Woods
  • United States Army
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Aspen Global Change Institute
  • University of Florence
  • University of Warwick
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne
  • University of Florida
  • State of Colorado
  • Future Analytics Consulting
  • Steinbeis Advanced Risk Technologies
  • Clark University
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre
  • Colorado State University
  • University of Virginia
  • Joint Global Change Research Institute
  • United States Geological Survey
  • University of Lisbon
  • National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
  • MD Sands Consulting Solutions LLC
  • NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION ASSOCIATION
  • Ohio State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

129 Scopus citations

Abstract

Regulatory agencies have long adopted a three-tier framework for risk assessment. We build on this structure to propose a tiered approach for resilience assessment that can be integrated into the existing regulatory processes. Comprehensive approaches to assessing resilience at appropriate and operational scales, reconciling analytical complexity as needed with stakeholder needs and resources available, and ultimately creating actionable recommendations to enhance resilience are still lacking. Our proposed framework consists of tiers by which analysts can select resilience assessment and decision support tools to inform associated management actions relative to the scope and urgency of the risk and the capacity of resource managers to improve system resilience. The resilience management framework proposed is not intended to supplant either risk management or the many existing efforts of resilience quantification method development, but instead provide a guide to selecting tools that are appropriate for the given analytic need. The goal of this tiered approach is to intentionally parallel the tiered approach used in regulatory contexts so that resilience assessment might be more easily and quickly integrated into existing structures and with existing policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1772-1780
Number of pages9
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume38
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Business processes
  • Disaster preparedness
  • Policy analysis
  • Resilience
  • Risk analysis
  • Systems analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tiered approach to resilience assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this