Abstract
The advantages and disadvantages of using global analyses on pressure level surfaces versus model (sigma or hybrid) level surfaces are explored. Model levels consist of a terrain-following coordinate in the lowest levels but may gradually transition to pressure with height. One major issue is that the model surface often does not correspond with the earth's real surface. Another is that a change in horizontal resolution is not well defined because the vertical coordinate also changes in the process. Another issue involves the meaning and use of time averages on model surfaces and their relationship to corresponding time averages on pressure surfaces. The traditional representation on constant pressure surfaces has much to recommend it and is widely used and familiar to the community, but suffers from errors arising from interpolation to the pressure surfaces and the need to properly treat regions of these surfaces that are below ground (in regions of high topography). -from Author
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 287-303 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Tellus, Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography |
| Volume | 47 A |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1995 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Truncation and use of model-coordinate data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver