Understanding Cloud and Convective Characteristics in Version 1 of the E3SM Atmosphere Model

  • Shaocheng Xie
  • , Wuyin Lin
  • , Philip J. Rasch
  • , Po Lun Ma
  • , Richard Neale
  • , Vincent E. Larson
  • , Yun Qian
  • , Peter A. Bogenschutz
  • , Peter Caldwell
  • , Philip Cameron-Smith
  • , Jean Christophe Golaz
  • , Salil Mahajan
  • , Balwinder Singh
  • , Qi Tang
  • , Hailong Wang
  • , Jin Ho Yoon
  • , Kai Zhang
  • , Yuying Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

134 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study provides comprehensive insight into the notable differences in clouds and precipitation simulated by the Energy Exascale Earth System Model Atmosphere Model version 0 and version 1 (EAMv1). Several sensitivity experiments are conducted to isolate the impact of changes in model physics, resolution, and parameter choices on these differences. The overall improvement in EAMv1 clouds and precipitation is primarily attributed to the introduction of a simplified third-order turbulence parameterization Cloud Layers Unified By Binormals (along with the companion changes) for a unified treatment of boundary layer turbulence, shallow convection, and cloud macrophysics, though it also leads to a reduction in subtropical coastal stratocumulus clouds. This lack of stratocumulus clouds is considerably improved by increasing vertical resolution from 30 to 72 layers, but the gain is unfortunately subsequently offset by other retuning to reach the top-of-atmosphere energy balance. Increasing vertical resolution also results in a considerable underestimation of high clouds over the tropical warm pool, primarily due to the selection for numerical stability of a higher air parcel launch level in the deep convection scheme. Increasing horizontal resolution from 1° to 0.25° without retuning leads to considerable degradation in cloud and precipitation fields, with much weaker tropical and subtropical short- and longwave cloud radiative forcing and much stronger precipitation in the intertropical convergence zone, indicating poor scale awareness of the cloud parameterizations. To avoid this degradation, significantly different parameter settings for the low-resolution (1°) and high-resolution (0.25°) were required to achieve optimal performance in EAMv1.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2618-2644
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Volume10
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • E3SM
  • EAMv1
  • cloud and convection
  • global climate model
  • model resolution
  • model tuning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding Cloud and Convective Characteristics in Version 1 of the E3SM Atmosphere Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this