Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)

  • E. Dupuy
  • , K. A. Walker
  • , J. Kar
  • , C. D. Boone
  • , C. T. McElroy
  • , P. F. Bernath
  • , J. R. Drummond
  • , R. Skelton
  • , S. D. McLeod
  • , R. C. Hughes
  • , C. R. Nowlan
  • , D. G. Dufour
  • , J. Zou
  • , F. Nichitiu
  • , K. Strong
  • , P. Baron
  • , R. M. Bevilacqua
  • , T. Blumenstock
  • , G. E. Bodeker
  • , T. Borsdorff
  • A. E. Bourassa, H. Bovensmann, I. S. Boyd, A. Bracher, C. Brogniez, J. P. Burrows, V. Catoire, S. Ceccherini, S. Chabrillat, T. Christensen, M. T. Coffey, U. Cortesi, J. Davies, C. De Clercq, D. A. Degenstein, M. D. De Mazière, P. Demoulin, J. Dodion, B. Firanski, H. Fischer, G. Forbes, L. Froidevaux, D. Fussen, P. Gerard, S. Godin-Beekmann, F. Goutail, J. Granville, D. Griffith, C. S. Haley, J. W. Hannigan, M. Höpfner, J. J. Jin, A. Jones, N. B. Jones, K. Jucks, A. Kagawa, Y. Kasai, T. E. Kerzenmacher, A. Kleinböhl, A. R. Klekociuk, I. Kramer, H. Küllman, J. Kuttippurath, E. Kÿröla, J. C. Lambert, N. J. Livesey, E. J. Llewellyn, N. D. Lloyd, E. Mahieu, G. L. Manney, B. T. Marshal, J. C. McConnel, M. P. McCormick, I. S. McDermid, M. McHugh, C. A. McLinden, J. Mellqvist, K. Mizutani, Y. Murayama, D. P. Murtagh, H. Oelhaf, A. Parrish, S. V. Petelina, C. Piccolo, J. P. Pommereau, C. E. Randall, C. Robert, C. Roth, M. Schneider, C. Senten, T. Steck, A. Strandberg, K. B. Strawbridge, R. Sussmann, D. P.J. Swart, D. W. Tarasick, J. R. Taylor, C. Tétard, L. W. Thomason, A. M. Thompson, M. B. Tully, J. Urban, F. Vanhellemont, C. Vigouroux, T. Von Clarmann, P. Von Der Gathen, C. Von Savigny, J. W. Waters, J. C. Witte, M. Wolff, J. M. Zawodny
  • University of Waterloo
  • University of Toronto
  • Université Laval and Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • University of York
  • Dalhousie University
  • NIWA
  • Picomole Instruments Inc.
  • Japan National Institute of Information and Communications Technology
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
  • University of Saskatchewan
  • University of Bremen
  • University of Massachusetts
  • Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique
  • Université d'Orléans
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • Naval Research Laboratory
  • Danish Meteorological Institute
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
  • University of Liege
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
  • Sorbonne Université
  • UVSQ
  • University of Wollongong
  • York University Toronto
  • Chalmers University of Technology
  • Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
  • Fujitsu
  • Australian Antarctic Division
  • Finnish Meteorological Institute
  • New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
  • NASA Langley Research Center
  • GATS, Inc.
  • La Trobe University
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • National Institute of Public Health and the Environment
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Bureau of Meteorology Australia
  • Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

95 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper presents extensive bias determination analyses of ozone observations from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) satellite instruments: the ACE Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) and the Measurement of Aerosol Extinction in the Stratosphere and Troposphere Retrieved by Occultation (ACE-MAESTRO) instrument. Here we compare the latest ozone data products from ACE-FTS and ACE-MAESTRO with coincident observations from nearly 20 satellite-borne, airborne, balloonborne and ground-based instruments, by analysing volume mixing ratio profiles and partial column densities. The ACEFTS version 2.2 Ozone Update product reports more ozone than most correlative measurements from the upper troposphere to the lower mesosphere. At altitude levels from 16 to 44 km, the average values of the mean relative differences are nearly all within +1 to +8%. At higher altitudes (45-60 km), the ACE-FTS ozone amounts are significantly larger than those of the comparison instruments, with mean relative differences of up to +40% (about +20% on average). For the ACE-MAESTRO version 1.2 ozone data product, mean relative differences are within ±10% (average values within ±6%) between 18 and 40 km for both the sunrise and sunset measurements. At higher altitudes (∼35-55 km), systematic biases of opposite sign are found between the ACEMAESTRO sunrise and sunset observations. While ozone amounts derived from the ACE-MAESTRO sunrise occultation data are often smaller than the coincident observations (with mean relative differences down to-10%), the sunset occultation profiles for ACE-MAESTRO show results that are qualitatively similar to ACE-FTS, indicating a large positive bias (mean relative differences within +10 to +30%) in the 45-55 km altitude range. In contrast, there is no significant systematic difference in bias found for the ACE-FTS sunrise and sunset measurements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-343
Number of pages57
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 16 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this