Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of ozone monitoring instrument nitrogen dioxide columns

  • E. A. Celarier
  • , E. J. Brinksma
  • , J. F. Gleason
  • , J. P. Veerkind
  • , A. Cede
  • , J. R. Herman
  • , D. Ionov
  • , F. Goutail
  • , J. P. Pommereau
  • , J. C. Lambert
  • , M. Van Roozendael
  • , G. Pinardi
  • , F. Wittrock
  • , A. Schönhardt
  • , A. Richter
  • , O. W. Ibrahim
  • , T. Wagner
  • , B. Bojkov
  • , G. Mount
  • , E. Spinei
  • C. M. Chen, T. J. Pongetti, S. P. Sander, E. J. Bucsela, M. O. Wenig, D. P.J. Swart, H. Volten, M. Kroon, P. F. Levelt
  • KBR, Inc
  • Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • St. Petersburg State University
  • CNRS
  • Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
  • University of Bremen
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
  • Washington State University Vancouver
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
  • National Institute of Public Health and the Environment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

207 Scopus citations

Abstract

We review the standard nitrogen dioxide (NO2) data product (Version 1.0.), which is based on measurements made in the spectral region 415-465 nm by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on the NASA Earth Observing System-Aura satellite. A number of ground- and aircraft-based measurements have been used to validate the data product's three principal quantities: stratospheric, tropospheric, and total NO2 column densities under nearly or completely cloud-free conditions. The validation of OMINO2 is complicated by a number of factors, the greatest of which is that the OMI observations effectively average the NO2 over its field of view (minimum 340 km2), while a ground-based instrument samples at a single point. The tropospheric NO2 field is often very inhomogeneous, varying significantly over tens to hundreds of meters, and ranges from <1015 cm-2 over remote, rural areas to >10 16 cm-2 over urban and industrial areas. Because of OMFs areal averaging, when validation measurements are made near NO2 sources the OMI measurements are expected to underestimate the ground-based, and this is indeed seen. Further, we use several different instruments, both new and mature, which might give inconsistent NO2 amounts; the correlations between nearby instruments is 0.8-0.9. Finally, many of the validation data sets are quite small and span a very short length of time; this limits the statistical conclusions that can be drawn from them. Despite these factors, good agreement is generally seen between the OMI and ground-based measurements, with OMI stratospheric NO2 underestimated by about 14% and total and tropospheric columns underestimated by 15-30%. Typical correlations between OMI NO2 and ground-based measurements are generally >0.6.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberD15S15
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
Volume113
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of ozone monitoring instrument nitrogen dioxide columns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this